|

Martin Luther
(1483-1546)
Here is the complete text, in English, of the
thesis that outlined Luther's ideas on Free
Will.
The Bondage of the Will, by
Martin Luther (1524), was the cornerstone of the Protestant Reformation;
it argues the idea of predestination and God's sovereignty, two principles
which were paramount to many of the American colonists. |
Martin Luther
The Original Protestant
Martin Luther was critical of the powers in
Rome that headed the catholic church for quite a while. The explosion
finally came around the matter of the financing of the lavish building
program of Saint Peter's Basilica in Rome. As a somewhat unintended
spokesman for this critical mindset, in 1517 Luther posted his 95 theses
on the door of the Wittenburg castle church protesting, for theological
reasons, the sale of indulgences to finance the pope's schemes.
Behind this defiant action was a long
personal pilgrimage of Luther, one based on an deep desire to unburden
himself of a profound sense of guilt and personal condemnation before
God's judgment. For Luther, a personal breakthrough occurred as the
message sank into the head of this Augustinian professor concerning Paul's
teaching (Galatians and Romans) about divine grace and forgiveness
received through the simple faith of the believer--and not through the
demands of any religious law or requirements of a religious system. So
"liberated" was he that he felt that his discovery had to be brought to
the world.
The occasion of the sale of indulgences
brought this desire to the fore. With this action of challenging papal
authority, Luther, unaware of where this would eventually take him,
uncorked an explosive force among fiercely faithful Christians. It also
excited the political interests of the German princes who saw in this
theological revolution an economic/political opportunity they could not
pass up.
For Luther the reform movement was related
to the matter of a sinner's personal justification before God. Luther
showed little interest in making broader changes within Christianity
beyond the throwing off of Roman spiritual authority--with its traditions
of works-righteousness. Substantial changes in worship, for instance,
were of lesser interest to Luther. Also the episcopal form of church
government (rule by bishops) was kept by Luther--though with the
understanding that the bishops were answerable to the local princes--not
to Rome.
The pope's ability to reply to Luther's
challenge to ecclesiastical authority was greatly limited by the
protection that Frederick, imperial elector, placed around Luther.
Meanwhile, in Luther's debates with the papal opponents sent to silence
him, he was gradually drawn more deeply into a position defiant of Rome.
By 1520, Luther's defiance of Rome was total. To Luther, Rome was the
anti-Christ. At the end of that year Luther boldly and publicly burned
the papal bull requiring his submission. Luther, and much of Germany with
him, was in full religious rebellion against Rome.
The newly elected Holy Roman Emperor,
Charles V (ruler of: powerful Spain and its wealthy American colonies, the
commercially energetic Netherlands, and Austria and much of Italy), now
took up the issue on the side of the Roman church. Luther, now
excommunicated but still under the protection of Frederick and widely
popular in Germany, was called by the Emperor to an Imperial Council at
Worms to give account of his views. Here Luther stood firm in his views
against the Roman church. Under an Imperial guarantee of his freedom,
Luther was able to get away from the Council before the guarantee was
retracted. From then on for the rest of his life, Luther remained in
seculsion--publishing works against the papacy and bringing forth his
German translation of the Bible.
In the meanwhile the Emperor found himself
preoccupied by an on-going war with France over control of various cities
and principalities in Italy. Thus the Emperor was seriously distracted in
his effort to quiet Luther. Then the Turkish military threat to the
Emperor's Austrian holdings rose up again. Thus with the Emperor
preoccupied elsewhere, Luther was relatively safe.
But events took an unexpected turn when in
1524-1525 German peasants, in the name of their new freedom of conscience,
rose up in rebellion against their feudal lords. Luther sided with the
lords against the peasant "hordes." These pitiful peasant rebels
were cruelly crushed.
The result of the Peasant War was to move
real power over to the various German princes. Thus in Germany, the rule
of the church was not a matter either of local congregational power--nor
of the power of popes and bishops. Rather, it was the ruling prince in
each of the many principalities that made up Germany who determined each
in his own territory its particular Christian character. Some remained
loyal to Rome (the southern German princes), some followed the Lutheran
line (the northern German princes). But in any case it was the local
princes who made that determination. The dependence of church on state
was thus set as the characteristic feature of German Christianity--a
feature lasting down into the 20th century.
|